|
|
| The Silver Soapbox is my venue to expound on certain
aspects and issues related to the Silver Era of Pioneer components. If an issue
comes up from email discussions, it will be addressed here.
Soapbox Topic No. 5: Made in …..China (Added 08/18/2003) The appeal of Pioneer components from the Silver Era, the one thing that is immediately apparent upon seeing them, is their build quality. The look, the feel, the sound and oftentimes the sheer weight of the component spoke volumes about its quality. That is why so many of the components built by Pioneer in the 1970s and early 1980s are still around today, giving pleasure to a new generation of music listeners. I recently took delivery of a New Old Stock SX-1280 from my good friend John in Canada. Some years ago, John had bought two SX-1280s from a Pioneer dealer in Ontario who had never sold them. When John learned the dealer had two of them still sealed in the box, he could not get his checkbook out fast enough. He took them home, opened one to use and enjoy; the other he stored. Every six months or so, he would take out the stored SX-1280, power it up, check out, then tuck it back into its foam-lined box. A few months ago, John contacted me and told me of his vast Silver Pioneer collection. I told him I hoped to one day acquire a nice condition SX-1280. Well, he offered to sell me his stored SX-1280. We agreed to a price and within a week the receiver was mine. Pictures cannot do the SX-1280 justice, and they never will. When I took it out of the box, I was transported back to 1978. It was absolutely pristine—I believe the word is MINT. I bought my first new Pioneer receiver in 1973—an SX-727—when I was in college, and this brought back a flood of memories. But now I had a new frame of reference. The SX-1280 must qualify as one of the most stunning (if I can use that word) receivers ever designed by any electronic component manufacturer. The tuning dial alone is a work of art, the knobs and toggles all machined aluminum, of course, and the fascia brushed aluminum. The walnut veneer still had some of its wonderful aroma. One other thing: I nearly pulled my back out taking it out of the box because it weighs nearly 65 pounds. Does that number have the same meaning for you it does me? Few audio components today of any kind weigh that much. Looking inside the receiver tells part of the story. The circular toroidal transformer is huge, surrounded by four large electrolytic capacitors. Flanking them are the left and right channel circuit boards. A very impressive site. I plugged in my CD player, hooked up the speakers and sat back to enjoy vintage Pioneer sound. One of the reasons this receiver has such superb build quality is this: it was Made in Japan. And that brings me to the point of this soapbox. During the late 1970s and early 1980s, Japanese audio component manufacturers started moving production of lower-end components to other countries where production costs were lower. Pioneer started doing this with some of its most affordable receivers by moving production to Korea. Virtually all Japanese consumer audio component manufacturers started doing this as a means of lowering costs and holding the line on prices in the face of rising global inflation. This trend accelerated in the 1990s. Malaysia became a primary manufacturing base for many Japan-based companies. Quality was cut in other ways to keep costs down, including the disappearance of aluminum knobs and fascias, as well as real walnut veneer, to name just two. Pioneer had launched the ELITE line of components in 1985 and by the late 1980s, ELITE components were considered among the finest stereo components in the world at any price. One of the reasons for that is that ELITE components were manufactured in Japan, where quality control is paramount. I am also a fan of ELITE components, and have launched the ELITE Stereo Reference Site (http://elitestereo.netfirms.com/.) Take a look. When production of Japanese components moved "offshore," component reliability and durability declined. Read any component review on the AudioReview.com website and if the "Japanese" component has gotten poor reviews for one reason or another, I can almost guarantee it was not made in Japan. Recently, I decided to buy a new CD changer with HDCD decoding capability, and settled on a Denon DCM-380. I assumed since it was a Denon, it was made in Japan. How naive. When it arrived, I was shocked to learn it was made in China. It was almost entirely of plastic, the drawer mechanism was noisy, and it didn’t sound all that great either. Having learned my lesson, when I shopped around for a CD Recorder to put my vintage LP albums in the digital domain, I checked out several different models and liked the TEAC RW-D250. Having learned my lesson, I called TEAC to find out where it was made. You guessed it: Made in China. I am still looking for a Japanese-made CD recorder. I also own a Sony C85ES CD changer I purchased over ten years ago. The thing is built like a tank, it has never failed to perform, it sounds superb, it has never been to a repair shop and, yes, it was Made in Japan. Of course, it cost me over $400 when I bought it, so the old saying applies: you get what you pay for. In other words, quality costs money. It has become clear that components that are made in Japan have become the new status symbols. These quality components will be around years from now while the cheap components have long since made their way to the local dump or recycling center. That makes listening to my magnificent SX-1280 all the more enjoyable. Soapbox Topic No. 4: Koss Still Makes 'Em Like They Used To (Added 06/28/2003)
I remember seeing a J & R Music World ad for these phones is an old issue of Stereo Review. I was curious what they sold for back then. I found the 1988 issue of the magazine and J & R advertised them for $59.95. I went on the J & R website and learned they were still selling for $59.95! That's right, you can go online today and find them selling for the same price they did 15 years ago. No inflation here, folks! I have enjoyed listening to them through my SA-9500 integrated amp and the sound is fabulous. However, they are heavy compared to other phones made today, so they are best used in a recliner or resting on a sofa or bed. Proof of the headphones seriousness is the 1/4-inch phono jack--no mini plug here! So do yourself a favor, blow $60 and listen to a classic pair of headphones through your classic Pioneer receiver or amp. Soapbox Topic No. 3: TEAC Gets It!
The big surprise about these components, aside from their good looks and impressive performance, it the very afford price. TEAC believes components don't necessarily have to be black in order to satisfy consumer demand. The TEAC Reference Series meets the desires of consumers who want that both look good and sound impressive. Photo: TEAC Corporation Soapbox Topic No. 2: The Silver Era Continues in Europe and Far East
Gazing at the VSA-AX10, it is enough to make a vintage Pioneer enthusiast start a letter writing campaign. And you could have some fun with this too. Go to above link and print out the page. Take it to you nearest Pioneer dealer who also carries the Elite line. Hand the salesman the print from the Pioneer website and say you would like to see this amp. He will probably have a blank expression on his face. When he says he doesn't carry it, say, " How can that be. This is a Pioneer and you are a Pioneer dealer." Try to keep a straight face. Demand to see product literature. Have them call Pioneer. If enough people do this, maybe Pioneer will get the hint and bring back silver finish components to the American market! Fortunately it has started to. Go the the New Silver page to see what is available in the U.S. To see more of Pioneer's components unavailable here in the United States, see the Unobtainia page. Soapbox Topic No. 1: When Did the Silver Era End?
But there were other specifications that told another story. The SX-8 weighed only 28 pounds, a weight loss of 50 pounds from the top-of-the-line SX-1980 Stereo Review tested in its December 1978 issue. Some prospective Pioneer receiver buyers who were stunned by the dramatic change in Pioneer’s receiver line went to stores looking for 1981 and even 1980 leftovers. They snapped up SX-D7000s, SX-D5000s, SX1280s, SX-1080s, SX-980s and so on down the line. It is not known how well the new line of receivers sold. However, the SX line of receivers from 1982 on clearly lack the aesthetic and tactile qualities that made earlier models such a pleasure to use, listen to and to look at. Pioneer did not operate in a vacuum, of course. This trend was industry-wide. The first all-black components were also starting to appear, and within five years virtually all home stereo mid-fi components were black. An analogy can be made with cars of various periods. Among the most collectible postwar cars for the last few decades have been the "classic Chevys" from 1955, 1956 and 1957. These cars have become automotive icons for a many solid reasons, primarily timeless styling and great engineering. Owners lavish untold dollars restoring them. However, the years preceding and following these three years are virtually forgotten. When was the last time you saw a 1954 or 1958 Chevy? Those were uninspired years and don’t draw the interest of Chevy enthusiasts as do the classic Chevys. The same analogy can be made of cars from the muscle car era of the late sixties and early 1970s. Often times Pioneer receivers from the late 1970s and early 1980s are referred to as "muscle receivers" due to their prodigious power output per channel. For example, the Dodge Charger R/T of the late 1960s is most collectible today, but the Charger of the 1980s is nowhere to be found, or even wanted. So it is with Pioneer’s Silver Era. These components were magnificent
then and they are magnificent still, which is why they are being snapped up by
collectors and Pioneer enthusiasts. |
Article:
|
|
|